I'd rather have Vick than T-Jack. With Vick, you're basically going to have an improvisational runner. Anything that adds improvisation to Brad Childress' offensive scheme is an improvement.
The real question is why you're focused on who the Bears will field at QB. With Chris Williams manning the left tackle with no experience and Jon Tait retiring, you might as well put a tackling dummy at QB.
The only real that I am thinking football at all is because of Brett Favre. And I think we can all agree that every monring when we awake, we should think of Brett Favre!
8 comments:
I hope it's Grossman (for the Vikings' sake).
Why- so the Vikes don't sign him?
Correct. I'm not interested in signing a QB who can't see over his line.
That's the least of his problems. I suggest the Vikes goes with Michael Vick to complement T-Jack.
I'd rather have Vick than T-Jack. With Vick, you're basically going to have an improvisational runner. Anything that adds improvisation to Brad Childress' offensive scheme is an improvement.
The real question is why you're focused on who the Bears will field at QB. With Chris Williams manning the left tackle with no experience and Jon Tait retiring, you might as well put a tackling dummy at QB.
The only real that I am thinking football at all is because of Brett Favre. And I think we can all agree that every monring when we awake, we should think of Brett Favre!
That's taking it a bit too far, I would think.
That seems to be ESPN's approach.
Post a Comment